Skip to content

Gap between cost of longer and short term mortgages in the UK is narrowing

The gap between longer term 10 year mortgages and the more popular two year fixed deals is becoming narrower with the cost of a longer loan at its lowest point since the financial crisis of 2008, according to a new analysis of Bank of England data.

The average 10 year fixed rate mortgage at 75% loan to value (LTV) was 2.76% in April 2018, down from 2.78% a year earlier. In contrast, the average two year 75% LTV fixed rate was 1.72%, up by 37 basis points from the record low of 1.35% seen in April 2017.

As a result, the ‘security premium’ or price difference between the average 10 year and two year fixed rate mortgage has fallen from 1.43% last April to just 1.04% today, the lowest it has been since December 2008, according to the analysis of Bank of England data by mortgage broker Private Finance.

It points out that a decade ago the average 10 year rate was 5.72%, whereas today’s average product is less than half of this price at 2.76% and still close to the record low of 2.66% seen in December 2017 and January 2018. Product availability has also improved, with 10 year fixes having been largely absent from the market between summer 2009 and summer 2014.

The research also shows that the narrowing price gap between 10 and two year fixed rates has cut the difference in monthly repayments by 27% from £105 a month to £77 a month. Based on a mortgage of £150,000, the average borrower would have paid £694 a month for a 10 year fixed rate product in April 2017, compared to £589 for an average two year fix.

The rising cost of two year fixes mean that monthly repayments would now be £616 for a £150,000 loan taken out at the last average rate, while the average monthly repayment on a ten-year product has remained stable at £693, according to the firm.

It also explains that this falling security premium means that a small number of modest base rate rises over the next few years, coupled with a round of remortgaging costs if borrowers take a shorter term fix, might be all that is needed for the 10 year rate to end up costing less.

Having restored the base rate to 0.5% in November 2017 after 15 months at an all-time low of 0.25%, the Bank of England has hinted that further rate rises may be on the cards this year. The next monthly decision from the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is due on 22 June, with the previous vote on 10 May having seen a seven to two decision in favour of maintaining the 0.5% rate.

The firm also points out that the higher cost of a 10 year fixed product comes with effective immunity against future rate rises, which benefits borrowers if rates subsequently rise but penalises them if rates subsequently fall.

And, while most 10 year mortgages are ‘portable’ and can be transferred to a new property when people move home, concerns over potential early repayment charges (ERC) if people want to reduce the loan, for example by downsizing, remortgaging early or paying off the loan before the fixed period expires, might have lessened the appeal of long term fixes in the past.

‘With small but more frequent rate rises rumoured to be on the horizon, borrowers should be cautious about growing comfortable or complacent about today’s mortgage pricing, which remains nearer to record lows for long term loans than for short term ones. Brexit is clearly a source of uncertainty, but the bargain basement base rate for borrowers that we’ve come to accept as the new normal post 2008 still seems unlikely to stick around indefinitely,’ said Shaun Church, director of Private Finance.

‘The UK mortgage market has tended to favour a short term fix, but longer term options are looking increasingly attractive in anticipation of the Bank of England following through with incremental rises to the base rate. Locking in for a decade can give borrowers immunity from further rate rises hitting their monthly repayments, and allow them to benefit from today’s low pricing for up to a decade,’ he explained.

‘In the past, the appeal of long term fixes has been tempered by a perceived lack of flexibility and the chance that rates might fall and leave people paying more than they were switching every two years. However, with households staying put in their homes for longer and rates having little room to fall any lower than they already are, it may be time to reassess some of these concerns,’ he added.

Topics

Related